https://images.hive.blog/p/26uUsAjKTsXCDw7zixZR182JbFKvgzJ9YwsFpTVcRaGCmsqhA1unTgpqZZCEJ3EVd6kMPmgGrXz4w43n9nWC4yQTkyuM7fnPPpaCm12yofAb9WTNoymK95cS758hczW1541ZHgdy9429iFCWPBghvCW3xodDsyRbQcspJJ?format=match&mode=fit
❤️❤️Hola amigos❤️❤️Hoy vengo a mostrarles esta deliciosa y saludable receta para un almuerzo. Lo primordial que debe haber en un plato son los carbohidratos, la proteína y los vegetales. Así que quise elaborar algo completo y fácil. Los ingredientes que utilicé fueron:
❤️❤️Hello friends❤️❤️Today I come to show you this delicious and healthy recipe for a lunch. The main things that should be in a dish are carbohydrates, protein and vegetables. So I wanted to make something complete and easy. The ingredients I used were:
Lo primero que haremos será nuestro arroz, como se indica en el empaque, casi siempre la fórmula son dos tazas de agua por cada taza de arroz y sal al gusto. The first thing we will do will be our rice, as indicated on the package, almost always the formula is two cups of water for each cup of rice and salt to taste. Lavamos nuestras verduras, y las picamos. El coliflor lo colocamos en una olla con agua a hervir hasta que ablande. La ensalada se prepara con un chorrito de aceite y sal. We wash our vegetables and chop them. The cauliflower we put it in a pot with water to boil until it softens. The salad is prepared with a drizzle of oil and salt. Y para finalizar, freímos dos huevos y sal gusto. And finally, we fry two eggs and salt to taste. Este fue el resultado, un almuerzo súper fácil y saludable. Hasta la próxima❤️❤️This was the result, a super easy and healthy lunch. See you next time❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️Traducido con DeepL
Originally posted: https://hive.blog/hive-120586/@emybaby/esoren-un-almuerzo-super-facil-or-a-lunch-super-easy
0 Comments
https://images.hive.blog/p/3W72119s5BjVs3Hye1oHX44R9EcpQD5C9xXzj68nJaq3CeGPmSAQAub5vQpRRuCdnCvPpTGCp8q1EpT8NS8KACauPWYkXveH9mVB1GREYG787mdTpsNdmQ?format=match&mode=fit
Hello everyone from a new day, today is Monday. The weather was sunny and beautiful. I walked to work in the morning. I forgot to open the app so my score is showing low. I wish everyone a healthy and wonderful day.
3778
Walking Originally posted: https://hive.blog/hive-193552/@rtonline/actifit-rtonline-20210921t122848381z
https://images.hive.blog/p/ADdPNihJzmPcLkHtjKRVWu2N2uvBRfNLKJYb8XFwnzuPVQ1TCD2sbztqq8HRwJVBZBXVNsstVSQfxZjM72uSzh6SP?format=match&mode=fit
I hope my friends you all are fit and healthy with your family. As we know daily excersie is good for health. Regards
1584
Running, Yoga Originally posted: https://hive.blog/hive-193552/@idea-make-rich/actifit-idea-make-rich-20210921t102227382z
https://images.hive.blog/p/FxX5caie56yoXoGCCgZvo2HjgcUgMTMcgvDk2qsPY4SS4o5QTbz93Kir592pftUu5xCCoLp2N3DSswQ4QWaTaXhRuTzyfD7sodhChihKHoJv?format=match&mode=fit
I didn't do all that much on monday aside from joining my 18:15 hot yoga class which now has become part of my routine again and the last 12 days have been pretty great when it came down to my consistency in eating healthy, working out, drinking water, and sleeping well. I do plan to keep this going as long as possible even thoug I kind of know it will be inevitable to have some set back at times.
Daily Reps Challenge The goal is do reps consistenty on a daily basis forcing myself to do at least 1 which most times will lead to a lot more and the goal is to go without actually being in major discomfort the day after slowly increaing the load over time. 1x12 Pull Ups
Originally posted: https://hive.blog/hive-101690/@byebyehamburgers/day-1249-or-hot-yoga-monday
https://images.hive.blog/p/3RTd4iuWD6NUeJEn5AVrJUoyatFqBqfcCJi1N7UixR4g2KPKN7w8NpZKAJSmdWjbKHyobTHrHBdmUsLSWF2qvC9Ywt5CVXbkq2WhdVB2Un2KYjxmm4Cffbraq8dGfXfgLjB4NQUEqTYgZoTkUYvRbYVcSpFVL4joTfF9Y7gZ3dKSYE?format=match&mode=fit
Natural Immunity, the ‘Vaccine’ That Destroys it, and the Crime Against Humanity These Mandates are - Part 2According to the large body of compelling available scientific evidence, natural immunity acquired from exposure to ‘Covid19’ is extremely strong and effective, robust, long-lasting, and offers far more comprehensive and durable protection than any ‘protection’ that may be offered by these experimental mRNA injections. There is also evidence suggesting that the Covid ‘vaccines’ suppress, deplete or destroy the main components of this far superior natural immunity acquired during infection, accompanied by a coverup, a whole lot of propaganda, and a story that needs to be heard. Injection ‘wipes out’ naturally acquired antibodies or otherwise renders them ineffective at battling coronavirus, Red Cross policy reveals, and the propaganda campaign that ensued to bury this storyIn February, the American Red Cross stopped accepting convalescent plasma donations exclusively from prospective donors who had been vaccinated, as documented in an archived version of their page on blood donations from the time, because the blood was ineffective at helping battle the ‘virus’ in ‘Covid19’ patients. “Individuals who have received a COVID-19 vaccine are not able to donate convalescent plasma with the Red Cross,” the organization’s website said. Convalescent plasma is blood taken from recovered ‘Covid19’ patients, which is then used to help fight the ‘virus’ in those battling the disease, as the antibodies created during the body’s previous exposure are apparently effective in helping Covid patients recover by targeting the ‘virus’ in the same way they would as a part of the natural immune response upon future exposure in the donor. It is important to understand that all convalescent plasma comes from recovered ‘Covid19’ patients, and if only convalescent plasma from the unvaccinated is effective in battling coronavirus, then it must mean the injection in some way renders the naturally acquired antibodies ineffective at doing their job, what they would otherwise do when confronted with the disease again - effectively suppressing, neutralizing, or destroying them altogether. Indeed, this is exactly what mainstream news outlets reported at the time. “The Red Cross said vaccinated people can't donate plasma because the shot counteracts existing antibodies,” Komu 8 News, a South Carolina NBC affiliate reported on February 28. "Usually, the COVID-19 antibodies will stay in a person's plasma or blood for about three to four months," American Red Cross Regional Communications Manager Joe Zydlo is quoted as saying by Komu 8, immediately followed by the claim that, “American Red Cross said ... the shots counteract [those] existing antibodies,” the reason given as to why they stopped accepting this plasma from only the vaccinated. A television news anchor similarly reported, using slightly different language, that the injection “wipes out those antibodies”: “The Red Cross says anyone who has received their COVID-19 vaccine cannot donate convalescent plasma to help other COVID-19 patients in hospitals. That plasma is made up of antibodies from people who have recovered from the virus, but the vaccine wipes out those antibodies, making the convalescent plasma ineffective at treating other COVID-19 patients.” The video clip - original source unknown, but widely circulated on the internet - has been archived by The Last American Vagabond and can be viewed here. This news has since been thoroughly ‘fact-checked’, the Red Cross denies it ever said anything to this effect, its website was soon updated to reflect an entirely different reason for refusal to accept convalescent plasma that had nothing to do with vaccination status, and this story was relegated to the realm of ‘anti-vaxxer conspiracy’ material. But the fact remains that an NBC news affiliate reported the Red Cross as making this claim, while archives prove the Red Cross originally did stop accepting convalescent plasma from the vaccinated exclusively, and their subsequent updates to hide that fact turn out to be inherently deceitful. And, as of this writing over six months later, Komu 8 News has still not retracted their contentious statement. I would imagine this is in large part because ‘anti-vaxxers’ and the ‘fact-checkers’ alike focused almost exclusively on the viral video clip. Also, the following explanation remained on the Red Cross website for several months, but has since also been removed along with the initial statement:
We can clearly see that the way in which antibodies from the vaxxed versus the unvaxxed “are not the same,” is that those in the vaxxed are not effective in helping treat Covid patients, or else Red Cross would not have continued accepting convalescent plasma from the unvaccinated for a time. The reason for this likely being that, “because with natural immunity, the body develops antibodies to the entire surface of the virus, not just a spike protein constructed from a vaccine,” as Dr. Marty Makary of John Hopkins has explained, and studies confirm that these naturally acquired antibodies are reactive not only against the spike protein, the only component of the virus the injection is designed to attack, but also, among other things, the receptor-binding domain (RBD), N-terminal domain (NTD), and the N protein. Research has also demonstrated that these naturally acquired antibodies, even in recovered patients exposed to the very earliest strains of the ‘virus’, both recognize and effectively protect against all of the new ‘vaccine resistant’ variants of concern currently said to be driving disease, including ‘Delta’, which the ‘vaccines’ are effectively defenseless against. Additionally, the Red Cross statement appears to confirm that the injection depletes the number of pre-existing natural antibodies, or one might say ‘wipes them out’; otherwise there would be no reason to accept unvaccinated convalescent plasma specifically in order “to ensure that antibodies collected from donors have sufficient antibodies directly related to their [natural] immune response.” This appears to be the primary reason for the introduction of the short-lived policy, and has nothing to do with the difference between antibody types but rather with the quantity of the naturally acquired antibodies, which are clearly effective at fighting active symptomatic disease where the ‘vaccine’-induced antibodies are not. And since it is all convalescent plasma we are talking about here, it can only be that the antibodies developed during infection are either wiped out, sufficiently depleted or counteracted in some way by the injections so as to render them ineffective, as the simple presence of ineffective ‘vaccine’-induced antibodies alone should not prevent or hinder the preexistent naturally acquired antibodies from effectively combatting the ‘virus’. Therefore, the only reasonable conclusion is that the initial reporting was correct, a coverup and subsequent damage control ensued, and the Red Cross has evidence that the injection renders naturally acquired antibodies ineffective at fighting the ‘virus’ in ‘Covid19’ patients, in some way, shape or form; and it would appear that this is indeed the case because those antibodies are sufficiently depleted or ‘wiped out’. At the time, the Red Cross also noted it was working to implement an updated policy in accordance with FDA guidelines which allow for donation of convalescent plasma from vaccinated patients for plasma treatment therapy, as long as the patient has recovered from disease within the past six months to ensure high natural antibody levels, the same requirements for unvaccinated plasma donors. But strangely they never did, and to the day they stopped collecting convalescent plasma donations altogether, they never once began accepting convalescent plasma from the vaccinated, because, as their website explained, vaccinated plasma had “[in]sufficient antibodies directly related to [the natural] immune response,” and the ‘vaccine’-induced antibodies were different to the degree that they were ineffective for treating patients. The FDA may have allowed it, but Red Cross was clearly aware of a problem, and despite FDA approval the organization was never willing to accept it themselves. And that should really beg the question, what information exactly did they have and what are they trying so desperately to hide? It seems clear enough upon review of the initial available evidence at the time, although fairly obscured by indirect language used by the Red Cross, nonetheless clear enough. They may be willing to cover this up for the narrative, but they were apparently entirely unwilling to accept ineffective treatment plasma, for they probably wouldn’t last very long as a major supplier of blood treatment products if a product like this was ineffective for the treatment it was being provided for. When I initially reported on this story back in the spring, I got some flack for citing ‘anonymous’ reports, due to my inability to find the original video source, but a mainstream outlet verifiably reporting the same claim in different words at the same time is to me evidence enough that the Red Cross did make a statement to this effect and that the video clip is at the least not a total ‘anti-vaxxer’ conspiracy hoax. “If [Red Cross] changed their official viewpoint and tried to hide their original announcement, surely there's still some record of it,” fellow truth seeker @Drutter wrote in a comment at the time, seeking additional evidence to support these claims. And I agree, there should be some record of the original announcement, and there is, over at Komu 8 News, still to this day. That stands with or without the acceptance of the video clip as a reliable source for this story. And now I am happy to finally be able to say that additional evidence has indeed surfaced, shedding more light on the ‘conspiracy theory’ that the injection weakens or destroys natural immunity, and it does not bode well for the ‘vaccine’-pushers or the ‘fact-checkers’. There is a highly relevant scientific study I just recently discovered which had actually already been published when I first wrote on this, and there is also some brand new evidence in the form of a recorded phone conversation with a Red Cross representative, thanks to Ryan Cristian over at The Last American Vagabond. There is also solid evidence that the Red Cross is to this day lying about why they really stopped collecting convalescent plasma for ‘Covid19’ patients, so let us start there. In the Red Cross page, “answers to common questions about Covid-19, vaccines and blood platelet plasma donation eligibility,” the organization responds to the claim that the injection “wipes out” antibodies acquired through natural infection, simply denying this is the case, and following up with this explanation:
It is worth noting that Red Cross initially stopped collecting convalescent plasma completely on March 26, so who knows what happened between then and June 14, just another layer of confusion to slice through, I suppose. At any rate they do not address the obvious problem with this denial, which is the absence of any alternative reason as to why they actually did initially stop accepting convalescent plasma from the vaccinated exclusively; they simply ignore this documented reality, and hope people are ignorant of the archived material and Komu 8 News report further substantiating it. The ‘fact-checkers’ similarly run circles around this core issue in their desperate attempts to avoid the problem at the heart of this controversy, and they are entirely unable to provide an answer to the question as to why exactly the Red Cross did stop accepting convalescent plasma from the vaccinated exclusively if the ‘vaccine’ does not in fact “wipe out” or otherwise “counteract” existing antibodies to the degree they are rendered ineffective at doing what they are otherwise able to effectively do prior to injection. Reuters ‘fact-check’ goes out of the way to stress that Red Cross never stopped accepting blood donations from the unvaccinated, and still accepts them to this day, as if this ‘debunks’ conspiracy claims, although this is not the issue, as only convalescent plasma donations were ever the issue of contention.
Above is the opening paragraph of the ‘debunk’, and sets the tone for the article. The fact-checkers then go on to admit that indeed Red Cross did initially stop accepting convalescent plasma from the vaccinated, but do not provide a legitimate reason as to why, instead simply referencing a statement made by the medical director of the Red Cross stating that the claim regarding the ‘vaccine’ wiping out antibodies is “inaccurate,” and that: “In most cases, you can donate blood, platelets and plasma after a COVID-19 vaccine as long as you’re feeling healthy and well.” But again, this of course does nothing to refute the valid claims being made that vaccinated patients exclusively were prohibited from donating convalescent plasma, and the statement simply circles around this, and says, without providing an alternate explanation for why this is, that the claim which says the injection wipes out antibodies is “inaccurate”. Note also that there is no refutation that the Red Cross initially did make such a claim, only an assertion that this claim is “inaccurate,” which could simply mean imprecise or inexact, not absolutely false. Could this claim be deemed “inaccurate” if only some of those naturally acquired antibodies were wiped out, if they were depleted to levels insufficient to battle the ‘virus’ with just a few remaining, or perhaps if they were “counteracted,” rendering them ineffective but still present to some degree? As we can see, the Red Cross is also running circles around the issue at hand, unwilling to give a direct answer that would clear up all confusion once and for all. As to the reason for this policy, we are at least given a hint by the Red Cross medical director:
This brings us back to the original explanation now removed from the Red Cross page, and the ‘fact-checkers’ do not comment on this summary of that explanation from Dr. Lasky or the more detailed explanation, let alone attempt to explain to the reader why it is, if the antibodies are different - and that difference is efficacy in battling the ‘virus’ - why this difference seen in ‘vaccine’-induced antibodies and their added presence alone in the blood should do anything to prevent the preexistent highly functional naturally acquired antibodies from being effective, unless the ‘vaccine’ also wipes them out, or depletes them to levels insufficient for treatment, or otherwise counteracts them. Furthermore, the ‘fact-checkers’ do not address the Komu 8 News statement, do not reach out to Komu 8 News for comment, and do not attempt to refute that it was reported by an NBC News affiliate that “Red Cross said ... the shot counteracts existing antibodies.” This is simply ignored, and the viral news clip is instead the focus of the ‘fact-check’, although they do not even attempt to explain why it was reported that Red Cross made a statement to the effect that the ‘vaccine’ “wipes out” antibodies, if they did not in fact initially make any such statement. Reuters does reference the video clip of the newscaster reporting this, but instead of directly addressing the claim made by the reporter, they point to the captions that allegedly “confuse plasma donations with convalescent plasma donations,” because the caption reads: “The American Red Cross says you cannot donated Blood Plasma if you’ve had the vaccine, because the vaccine wipes out the body’s natural antibodies.” The caption would only be ‘confusing’, however, if one was not actually listening to the newscaster herself, so this is just another circle being run around the issue at hand. The ‘fact-checkers’ continually point back to the acceptance of non-convalescent plasma donation from the vaccinated to deflect from the main issue they allege to be debunking, as if repeatedly deflecting from what should be the main subject of the ‘fact-check’ somehow bolsters their flimsy position.
Finally, the only evidence they provide as conclusive ‘proof’ that the injection does not wipe out antibodies is the FDA approval of convalescent plasma from vaccinated donors for treatment, as if FDA approval automatically equates to proof of efficacy.
But FDA approval absolutely does not on its own constitute proof of efficacy, and “therefore,” the only thing the fact-checkers have proved is their ignorant reliance upon the approval given by a demonstrably compromised organization, and not even a direct statement by the FDA refuting the claims in questions, to ‘debunk’ a claim based upon evidence they never even address or attempt to explain. Case in point: The FDA recently approved the Pfizer injection, but not the Moderna injection, despite the findings of a Mayo Clinic study indicating that Moderna has notably higher initial efficacy (86%) than Pfizer (76%), and Pfizer’s efficacy plummets far faster and to far lower levels after 6 months (42%) compared to Moderna (76%). That Pfizer’s own Phase 2 clinical study found that, “From its peak post-dose 2, observed VE [vaccine efficacy] declined,” and Israel has too reported a drop in efficacy to a mere 39% in just 5-6 months, and abundant real world data confirms Pfizer jab to be ineffective against all of the current variants of concern, and yet in the face of all of this evidence FDA prematurely issued Pfizer approval even before Phase 3 trials were complete, is altogether evidence enough that FDA approval alone is no guarantee of efficacy whatsoever. Also, just because convalescent plasma from the vaccinated is being used in plasma treatment therapy now, if it is, does not automatically prove it is effective either, as we know hospitals are more than willing to use highly ineffective treatments on Covid patients, even to the point of needlessly killing them; as was demonstrated with the widespread misuse of ventilators during the peak of the first wave of the ‘pandemic’, which had a 99% kill rate and were thus demonstrably ineffective, while the doctors who spoke out against this senseless policy were widely ignored along with the overwhelming evidence that this ‘treatment’ wasn’t working, to the detriment of the hastened deaths of countless Americans across the country, the number of which may have otherwise survived we will likely never know. So neither FDA approval nor widespread use of a treatment by the medical establishment on its own proves efficacy, that much is plain to see. And if there were any medical studies supporting the efficacy of post-injection convalescent plasma for treatment therapy as approved by the FDA, which had compared antibody levels and potency in the naturally immune before and after injection in this regard, Reuters would surely have cited them. But they did not, probably because no such studies have been published. As it is, Red Cross clearly has their hands on some such information, however, and it led them to stop accepting convalescent plasma donations from the vaccinated over issues directly relating to ineffectiveness. There is a reason the Red Cross has not publicly released the specific data they are privy to, and instead simply makes broad generalizations about the implications of that data from which researchers must infer what those data findings are. Releasing the specific information they have their hands on would go a long way in helping to clear up all the confusion, but I suspect confusion is what they prefer over publication of their specific findings. So after running readers in circles around the main issue, without even attempting to provide a clear answer as to why the Red Cross initially did stop accepting convalescent plasma from the vaccinated exclusively and never changed that policy despite FDA guidance permitting them to, the ‘fact-checkers’ have left intellectually honest researchers exactly where they were before, without any definitive answers, but with the ‘confusing’ Red Cross policy and all official explanations still pointing in one and only one direction - towards the only reasonable conclusion: that the ‘vaccine’ depletes preexisting antibodies, effectively counteracting or wiping them out, rendering convalescent plasma from the vaccinated ineffective at treating ‘Covid19’ patients where the same plasma from the unvaccinated is on the other hand very effective. And so the saga continues, with the original ‘conspiracy theory’ very much not put to rest, no matter how many flimsy ‘fact-checks’ ignoring the most relevant facts are produced. As to the claim that the donation program was shut down in response to declining hospital demand, there is evidence suggesting that there was not, and most certainly is not any longer, “a sufficient supply of convalescent plasma.” On July 1, two weeks after they discontinued all convalescent plasma donations (for the 2nd time?), the Red Cross issued a “Severe shortage alert,” indicating they were still in desperate need of blood donations. Maybe they just didn’t need convalescent plasma specifically, but that has since changed, although neither their refusal to accept donations nor their assertion that they and “industry partners” have a sufficient supply has changed at all. If this was ever the case, it is most certainly not the case any longer, as there are now severe shortages being reported all across the county. On Aug 19th it is reported that:
And on September 2, in a WKRN article with the headline Blood Assurance in urgent need of convalescent plasma donations, we can read that, “As more and more COVID-19 patients are admitted to hospitals around the country, there is a growing need for plasma that can be used to help them recover.” It sure doesn’t look to me like there is “sufficient supply” of convalescent plasma at all... One wonders if the increasing difficulty in finding donors is in part the inability to accept donations from the vaccinated who now make up a much larger percentage of the population than in February and March, or perhaps because the Red Cross is no longer playing any supply role as they typically would in such situations. As it is, we have every indication that this senseless Red Cross policy is remaining in place for the sole purpose of hiding the fact that they would otherwise only be accepting this much needed plasma from the unvaccinated. That they continue to state to this day that their current policy is in place because of ample supply when hospitals all across the country are literally putting out calls for donors because they are in desperate need due to severe widespread shortages is testament to the deception the organization is willing to employ, for reasons that by now should be readily apparent. Red Cross confirms convalescent plasma from vaccinated not accepted due to ineffectiveness at treating ‘Covid19’ patientsRyan Cristian over at TLAV media has been doing a great job of documenting this saga of ever-changing Red Cross explanations and ‘fact-checker’ attempts to ‘debunk’ the original story that started it all, and in a recent show largely dedicated to the subject on September 6, he aired a recorded phone call with the Red Cross, which turned out to be quite the bombshell. Attempting to clear up some of the confusion caused by the ever shifting Red Cross policies, Ryan asked for clarification on the current convalescent plasma donation policy and why they initially stopped accepting it from the vaccinated. The spokeswoman he was put on the line with confirmed that they did initially stop accepting convalescent plasma from the vaccinated for reasons having to do with ineffectiveness. “The reason being because the antibodies produced by the vaccine may not be strong enough to help someone battling covid19,” she said. “That’s why” Red Cross stopped accepting convalescent plasma from the vaccinated. She also confirmed that convalescent plasma from the unvaccinated, on the other hand, did not have this problem. “We were accepting from [unvaccinated] patients who had recovered,” she said. Only later, when they say supply began overtaking demand, did they stop the convalescent plasma donation program completely. I highly recommend listening to the entire conversation and even the show, or at least Ryan’s discussion about it (clip played between 1:50.00-2:10.00 in the full video), as it demonstrates how officials are trained to say one thing and then slip up and admit another when presented with evidence that catches them off guard, in this case in relation to Red Cross documents. And although it is not a direct admission that Red Cross initially stopped accepting donations from the vaccinated because the injection “counteracts” or “wipes out” naturally acquired antibodies as initially reported, it is probably as close as we will get in an official statement, and it is confirmation enough that this was in fact the reason. If the antibodies produced by the ‘vaccine’ were admittedly not strong enough, but the naturally acquired antibodies were, as evidenced by the continued acceptance of convalescent plasma from the unvaccinated patients who had recovered, then the only possible reason convalescent plasma from the vaccinated could be ineffective or less effective is if those naturally acquired antibodies were suppressed, counteracted, inactivated, depleted, or entirely wiped out by the injection, leaving only the ‘vaccine’-induced antibodies at play. There is no other way around it. Given all of the available evidence, I think it is safe to state as a matter of fact that anyone who is vaccinated within 5-6 months of recovery or exposure to the ‘virus‘ can expect any naturally acquired antibodies that are still in their bloodstream to be effectively neutralized and replaced with far less effective and less durable antibodies which are neither strong enough to battle coronavirus during a symptomatic infection nor at all effective against ‘Delta’ or any of the other ‘vaccine resistant’ variants which are, according to the narrative, currently driving disease. That the evidence strongly suggests the injection counteracts or wipes out these naturally acquired antibodies does not necessarily equate to a total destruction of natural immunity, as these antibodies in the bloodstream appear to naturally diminish after about 4-6 months,but it is foreboding. After all, when a UK study found that antibody levels following the Pfizer and AstraZeneca jabs began declining at six weeks and then plummeted to as low as 50% in just 10 weeks, The Guardian and ‘experts’ alike warned: “Waning antibody levels are possible warning sign of lower protection in months after vaccination.” Sure enough, we now know injection ‘protection’ has diminished to near zero efficacy after just six months. The study that indicates Pfizer injection destroys natural immunity, not just antibodiesWhether the antibodies produced from bone marrow cells (which evidence suggest are lifelong) in the naturally immune upon re-exposure to the ‘virus’ are similarly counteracted by the injection is yet unknown, and may depend upon whether the person has recently had a third or fourth injection or not. Whereas neutralizing antibodies in the bloodstream naturally diminish after a number of months, memory B cells patrolling the bloodstream increase in number over time, and studies suggest that T cell immunity remains strong and effective for decades. So the most important factor in whether or not the injections effectively destroy natural immunity altogether or only this one aspect of it likely lies with cellular immunity. In this regard, a study published by researchers from Paris and New York on March 22 found the Pfizer jab to cause similarly destructive effects upon cellular immunity in ‘Covid19’ recovered individuals, resulting in a “reduction of cellular immunity,” so it looks like these injections may effectively wipe out both circulating antibodies and memory T cells which we are being told can be expected to otherwise remain for decades.
Cellular immunity as opposed to antibody reactivity forms the core of the long-lasting natural immune response to future exposure expected in the naturally immune, so a reduction of cellular immunity signals the destruction of the body’s otherwise long-term immunity. Whether intended or not, this would work out quite conveniently for those selling the shots, as then even the previously naturally immune will need to keep coming back for ineffective boosters every few months, but it’s not such a great deal for those who would rather be set for life and don’t want to be dependent on Big Pharma for the rest of their life just to be ‘protected’ from a ‘virus’ no deadlier than the flu. Not being peer-reviewed, I am strictly prohibited from reporting these study findings as conclusive, but the evidence does not bode well for the natural immunity of the injected, that’s for sure, and it does appear to suggest that these experimental mRNA injections do effectively weaken or destroy the totality of natural immunity. Also indicative of this notion is the high and fast rising number of ‘breakthrough’ cases around the world that are not likely to be affecting the previously non-infected exclusively, given the high rates of vaccination and percentage of the population that should otherwise have natural immunity based upon prior disease prevalence and official estimates.
More studies should immediately be undertaken to look into these issues, but as it is, there is already absolutely no reason to be vaccinating the natural immune regardless of risks associated with the injection. There is no additional benefit to vaccination for the naturally immune, the studies have found, so there’s no reason to risk losing that natural immunity to an experimental injection which increasingly looks to be causing far more harm than good, in many more ways than one. And that will be the subject of the next post and final installment of this series, where we will look at the most criminal aspect of this vaccination coercion campaign of all - the intentional suppression of additional known ‘vaccine’ harms and blatant disregard for all rule of law in every aspect of the implementation of these nonscientific, tyrannical and downright dangerous mandates. Originally posted: https://hive.blog/hive-122315/@jasonliberty/evidence-this-vaccine-destroys-natural-immunity-a-red-cross-policy-news-reports-a-medical-study-and-proof-of-a-coverup
https://images.hive.blog/p/PB8ro82ZpZP35bVGjGoE93K3E4U5KX8KtMBJ2rh3sUMZSVJcVyDkrKmDt3jGeBYNSkbv7nnWfpYziJa33eu85ZyYNFNDZUM2vD2NUdy3ooFczfHQ?format=match&mode=fit
If you have one wish to live a Happy Life, what will you ask for...... Money, Power, Love, Success, Name, Fame............... In the recent times all that we have gone through, we have seen that none of them have been really useful. And the only thing all of us desire today is Good Health, Am I not right? Be it rich or poor, each and every single person today wishes for it, that they stay healthy and that this virus does not get on them. Truly Health is the most important thing. If we do not have that everything else will hold no meaning. A wealthy person with no good health is living a worse life than a poor person who has no wealth but good health. Having money and paying Doctors and Hospital bills is senseless. It is better that one takes good care of health and spends that money on travelling and exploring places. While everyone knows that health is so important, people still make foolish decisions. There are many people who if we advise them to make modifications in their diet which will increase their living cost, they do not prefer to do that, and it is all to save money, and then the same people spend money paying Doctor bills. The quality of food has deteriorated so much, it is important that we start making the right choices, by buying organic food and products and hormone free meat. Yes, for this we will have to pay some extra price which will be heavy on the pocket, but then we can decide to cut down on certain expenses which may not be holding much relevance. I have seen this in the Middle East and in India as well, maximum people eat outside in restaurants over the weekends. Imagine 4 meals in a restaurant with family or friends, even if you cut 2 of those restaurant meals and keep that budget for buying healthy organic food, that will be so much good for your health. First of all, you will cut down the 2 restaurant meals which are not very healthy, and secondly you will manage the higher food cost in the same budget. But when I talk to people on changing their diet style, they take a step back, with all these ifs and buts, they do not want to compromise on the lifestyle they already have, first of all that's not even a healthy lifestyle. Trust me till the time I shifted to the Middle East I would rarely visit a restaurant, once a month would be maximum, we were always on the home food. But after shifting to the middle east lifestyle started changing with friends, and here normally everyone goes out to restaurants at least twice a week and otherwise also a lot of preservative foods are used. For around 6 months, we even got into that, and in that time my husband got caught up with his autoimmune condition. We realized how toxic our food habits had become, and we again got back to our routines, but the damage was already done to his health. Two Healthy homemade meals are just enough for a person, and that can be well budgeted for in the monthly budget by cutting down unnecessary expenses. Once in a way indulgence is good. Eating out in local restaurants and the local cuisines is also not harmful, but the fast foods are definitely, which should be avoided completely. Again the diet that we consume does not even give enough Vitamins and Minerals that the body needs. Majority of the people if they get their blood test done, there will be some or the other vitamin deficiency observed. So it is important that on a regular basis Multivitamins and other food supplements are taken to keep the markers in green. What do you think an ideal vitamin D level is for the body? Minimum 30 is required for the body, but maximum people will be below that level, and vitamin D is the most important in so many ways for our body function. And Good Health does not stop here, one has to be mindful about the lifestyle, which includes sleep habits, exercise routines, avoiding addictions and also being mindful about mental health. So what do you think matters most to you? Thank you for visiting my blog. ?????????
Member of
Originally posted: https://hive.blog/hive-150329/@nainaztengra/all-i-want-is
https://images.hive.blog/p/2VZXybTSZJq1HdYsB7fJjuW6meDRuV7r8fXfxUUexE2gLoYHXteicT4v7wtFTLinDfyEMN43yXgrg2z4x51VUcQ5NahieKUHnnfrjWKYucVohEWVkybEUchYoovrqA5rNVaFwZ4UhfD5fQH31DZGacYnkDC?format=match&mode=fit
Hello! Welcome to this healthy entry ?
I was talking with my boyfriend about how we could include the arepa (which is our daily food) without affecting our health, and looking for options on the internet appeared several that I will be sharing, today the protagonism takes the Arepa of bran, cilantro and oats, with these ingredients increases the amount of fiber and substantially improves digestion, does not fall heavy at all and is delicious. Not to mention that thanks to the oatmeal also lowers the glycemic index of this meal, so it is also good for diabetics! Ingredients(Makes 4 arepas)
PreparationIn a bowl place the water and add a pinch of salt, then the flour, the chopped coriander and the bran, mix. Then add the oatmeal, this will prevent the flakes from hydrating and will give a crunchier touch and better consistency to the dough. Make small balls of dough and flatten them giving them a round shape, I made them in the tostiarepas, but you can also place them on a hot griddle, previously oiled. After being ready you can fill them with whatever you want, it can become an option to include vegetables in children's meals, it is also a healthy option for people suffering from digestive diseases such as inflammatory colopathy and constipation. Enjoy your meal! ?
Hola! Bienvenido a esta saludable entrada ? Estaba conversando con mi novio sobre cómo podríamos incluir la arepa (que es nuestro alimento diario) sin que nos afecte la salud, y buscando opciones en internet aparecieron varias que iré compartiendo, hoy el protagonismo lo lleva la Arepa de afrecho, cilantro y avena, con esos ingredientes aumenta la cantidad de fibra y mejora sustancialmente la digestión, no cae pesada en absoluto y es deliciosa. Sin contar con que gracias a la avena disminuye también el índice glucémico de esta comida, así que también es buen para diabéticos! Ingredientes(Rinde 4 arepas)
PreparaciónEn un bol se coloca el agua y se le añade una pizca de sal, luego la harina, el cilantro picado y el afrecho, se mezcla. Luego se añade la avena, esto permitirá que no se hidraten las hojuelas y así le da un toque más crujiente y mejor consistencia a la masa. Se hacen bolitas de masa y se aplastan dándole una forma redonda, yo las hice en el tostiarepas, pero también se puede colocar en una plancha caliente, previamente aceitada. Luego de estar listas las puedes rellenar con lo que desees, puede convertirse en una opción para incluir vegetales en las comidas de los niños, también es una opción saludable para las personas que sufren de enfermedades digestivas como colopatias inflamatorias y estreñimiento. Buen provecho! ? Originally posted: https://hive.blog/hive-120078/@anakmf10/recipe-arepa-de-afrecho-cilantro-and-oatmeal
https://images.hive.blog/p/NTy4GV6ooFRmaCXZ8UYgPhoud1kjiNX8QokLEZtbBKLuLWQ9yt7K3o4MPSdsNv6yEjLUxdn5z28SUpW3UjtwrKpdes43xTESWp1j2XXQcLu8oyDx11EHMRaKQRY7trAn4tLNnjbPcKSKjU1GEWfF8rSmPtiRG1h6c2dpZeJs?format=match&mode=fit
We often drink soft drinks or soft drinks to avoid the extreme heat. We have become accustomed to drinking the drinks that are usually available in the market. So even though it doesn't feel hot now, we are used to drinking them. Again many have become accustomed to drinking cold water left in the fridge. Especially people living in tropical countries have become addicted to such soft drinks or extra cold water. I often notice that when I take cold water out of the fridge or when I drink cold drinks like 7up , Speed , Coca-cola or such cold water from the shop, my sore throat or tonsil pain starts. Even when I drink these colds, I get colds and coughs. I also saw one of my colleagues addicted to cold water. In particular, he drinks a variety of soft drinks from the store. As a result, he has been suffering from chest pain and gastric problems lately. He had sought the help of a cardiologist a few days ago. The doctor later forbade him to eat these. Moreover, there is the problem of cold and cough. Also drinking this kind of cold water causes many problems in the body. Even cold water in the fridge can lead to obesity. Although I'm not entirely sure. But I heard something like this and now I have seen it somewhere. However, many times these drinks expire and they are often returned to the company. Then they change the level of the skin of the drink and renew it and continue it as legal. This is done by some soft drink companies in our country. I didn't know it before but one of my colleagues saw me drinking soft drink and told me about it. Because he was a chemist for a soft drinks company. He saw me drinking soft drinks one day and told me to stay away from them. Of course, not all companies engage in such fraud. He later quit that job and took a job with us in an educational project. In addition, during the Corona period, we have been repeatedly asked to completely avoid cold foods in our country. Especially from the government or the doctors warned the people about this. Moreover, many doctors advise to refrain from drinking such soft drinks at other times. I don't know if it's a problem for others to eat but I get colds and coughs when I eat cold foods. So those like me who have such problems we should refrain from drinking this kind of soft drink. Thanks For Your reading and visitingI am Md. Kawsar Hasan. I am Bangladeshi and proud to introduce myself as a Bangladeshi because I love my country so much. Because this is my motherland. I am engaged in the teaching profession. When I can teach my students something new, I have a different feeling. I also like to learn and do something new every day, I like to mingle with new people and like to learn something new. I always think of myself as a student of nature. Because we have a lot to learn from nature. I just try small to learn. I love to travel. A lot can be learned from nature through travel. Love to learn and write. I have been trying to write since I was a child and that is why I often fall behind in writing. I try to respect people. I think if you respect someone, your self-esteem does not decrease but increases. Follow Me On Twitter Originally posted: https://hive.blog/hive-120078/@kawsar8035/how-healthy-is-extra-cold-drink-or-soft-drink
https://images.hive.blog/p/Zskj9C56UonZ32EJw6nMctrTQ6kTQ3swaDmbMFuADL5MDRzTwfp2hMHLy68sHA4jenTJ8Eah11pbu4514bCq3C5oL6UjmrDkF3qyiiHErxsmS5z2wagn?format=match&mode=fit
When I was younger, I remember having certain opinions about what life would be like, as you got older. Most of those opinions, were formed by the people that I saw around me. I grew up in the countryside in Ireland and most people fed into this whole idea that ,when you get older, you would automatically become more frail. As though you had no choice in it, it was just a part of growing old, a natural part of life. With most people just accepting their faith. But as I got older, I began to understand that how we live our lives, is really up to us. We get to decide how we spend our days and whether or not we feed into these stereotypes, that are so prevalent in society today. Where it is widely accepted that most elderly people see out their last days in a nursing home. To be honest, I don't blame people for giving up, when they are placed in these homes. I have worked in some of them and they are soul destroying. But usually there are certain thins that happen, to warrant some one ending up in there. When I first became pregnant, I really expected to find myself in a position one day, where I would find it difficult to move about. Especially towards the end, when you supposedly unable to touch your toes. But I felt so energized and full of life, I also felt super healthy and enjoyed being very mobile. I never has any problems getting around, or needed any help doing things. So if we were mislead about this, of course we could so easily be mislead into believing that old age, leads to frailty. But again this is all a choice. We choose how we treat our bodies, what we consume, how active we are. If you make the decision to eat and live more consciously, then you are much more aware of your bodies needs and how to meet them. Of course our bodies, keep aging, but we learn how to listen and thus how to react. I find it funny, that some people invest way more time and energy into their cars, than they do in their own personal vessel. Where does this disconnect come from, our health and well being, should always be a priority. If you do not look after yourself then of course your body and mind will both suffer. Everything is connected and if you neglect one, you neglect them both. Old age does not mean that we have to become frail, indeed it should be about becoming wiser and more comfortable, within our own skin. With the loss of community down through the ages, especially in Western Society, most elderly people feel shunned upon, as though they are a burden. When instead they hold a powerful wisdom within, that comes when you reach a certain age, like the crone, for females. But to be able to connect with that wisdom, they need to be able to stand in their power. Something that society really prevents, so many of us from reaching. There really needs to be, a lot more understanding and respect between all ages. Where we each, see the value in one another. We need spaces where we all come together and listen to one another, to learn from one another. In order for any of us to respect others, we first need to respect ourselves and from here, with begin to grow a healthy relationship with our bodies, with our minds. We begin to take responsibility for our own well being. I now live in a place, where people of all ages come together, where yes you may need to slow down a little as you age and get wiser, but you certainly do not become frail. Time is really a concept that is mostly in our heads, so we get to decide how we improve with age, to not focus on this idea that we have to give up certain things. But instead embrace our wiser selves and continue to do the things we love. Originally posted: https://hive.blog/hive-150329/@trucklife-family/the-older-wiser-self-pob-wotw
https://images.hive.blog/p/KWcVEiwEzuiCuSxBHEf42JyWvZsZ7iHiL2G9DgNyjwiqbpDi8JdDgm7oPvQ8HeDu1yePXTyubGB4DSvgpn?format=match&mode=fit
Sometimes you are very tired, so you grab some food to eat. You are depressed, you start eating, and try to forget what you are going through. Are you overeating? Maybe you do not realize that you are overeating. You eat that your body does not need. Even though you go to the gym and do exercise, you will not see progress. You have to change your eating habits. It is you who can do something about it. In order to stay healthy and fit, it is very important to pay attention to what you eat. Let's watch this video. Please feel free to leave your comments below. Thank you for watching the video. Source: 1, and 2. About MeHi, I am Rezoanul Vibes. I'm a content creator and passionate learner. I write about lifestyle, martial arts, finance, and digital marketing. I'm glad to meet amazing people all over the world. Follow me on Twitter ▶️ 3Speak Originally posted: https://hive.blog/hive-181335/@rezoanulvibes/kyuayqik |
AboutOn HealthandFitnessFans you can find everything you need to live a fit and healthy life. Archives
September 2021
Categories |